Author(s): Niharika Gaur


DOI: 10.5958/2454-2687.2020.00014.3   

Address: Niharika Gaur
Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, Delhi and Kolkata, 700100.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 8,      Issue - 4,     Year - 2020

The purpose of the research is to establish what laws dictate the public and private broadcast and whether these laws actually hinder upon a universally declared fundamental right. Nations have been taken into consideration based on the roles played by public and private players in broadcast and the political & economical pressures put on these players due to the different types of social settings they operate in. The countries taken into consideration are Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States of America and India. First, the study discusses the various laws each of these nations and adopted. The laws which have a direct relationship with freedom of speech are taken into consideration. Later, the study delves into case studies showing why the laws have served to be so ambiguous and how the court or regulatory body has ruled in whose favor. Later, the study tries to make recommendations for each of these countries based on secondary data available which showcases, to an extent, of the citizens' point of view of the laws that they are subjected to and whether the recommendations directly contrast their points of view.

Cite this article:
Niharika Gaur. Broadcast Laws and its effects on freedom of Speech: A Comparative Analysis. Int. J. Rev. and Res. Social Sci. 2020; 8(4):288-298. doi: 10.5958/2454-2687.2020.00014.3

Niharika Gaur. Broadcast Laws and its effects on freedom of Speech: A Comparative Analysis. Int. J. Rev. and Res. Social Sci. 2020; 8(4):288-298. doi: 10.5958/2454-2687.2020.00014.3   Available on:

1.    Anil Kumar Pathlavath, (2018). Video for Change: Adolescent Video Active Girls (VAG) Project. Res. J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2018; 9(1): 100-106. DOI No: 10.5958/2321-5828.2018.00018.9
2.    Ann Ruane, K. (2014) Congressional Research Centre retrieved from
3.    Available at:
4.    Dasgupta, Partho: The Economic Times Blog (2016) -
5.    Davis, H
6.    Development of Mobile phone technology in Kenya and India. Anil Kumar Pathlavath.2013 .3,s.l.: CASIRJ,2013, International Research Journal of Commerce , Arts and Science ,Vol.4
7.    Freedom of Expression and Broadcast Regulation (UNESCO 2011) by Toby Mendel and Eve Salomon
8.    Freedom of Expression and Television Regulation: A comparative Analysis of Brazil and other countries (March 2012)
9.    Harrington, M.: Survey on People's trust on NGOs, Government, Media & Business (2017)
10. Adopted 18 December 2003.
11.    Kumar, A. (2019). Service-Learning: A Curriculum for Deliberations and Demonstrations. International Journal of Research and Analytical, 28.
12.    Mian R. US Press Freedom Rating Drops 29 Spots since ’10 February 2015
13.    Mondini A. and Menn A., Wittmer S. September 2011
14.    Of com Guidance Noted (2015) - data/assets/pdf_file/0017/24704/section1.pdf
15.    Pathlavath, A. K. (2010). girls amplify their voices in hyderabad. 10 tactics.
16.    Pathlavath, A. K. (2010). Homebody to video maker. Http://
17.    Pathlavath, A. K. (2010). Speaking for themselves. Http://
18.    Pathlavath, A. K. (2013). Development of Mobile Phone Technology in Kenya and India. Shri Paramhans Education & Research Foundation Trust, 4(3), 54–68.
19.    Pathlavath, A. K. (2016). Children as Media Producers (CAMP). FACE.
20.    Pathlavath, A. K. (2018). Video for Change: Adolescent Video Active Girls (VAG) Project. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 100-106. DOI No: 10.5958/2321-5828.2018.00018.9
21.    Pathlavath, Anil Kumar. (2013). “Development of Mobile Phone Technology in Kenya and India” International Research Journal of Commerce, Arts and Science, 4(3), 55-68.
22.    Pathlavath, Anil Kumar. (2017). "Participatory Video Practice: Amplifying Adolescent Girls’ Voice Through Video." Organising Committee: 34. ISBN No. 978-93-5267-935-5
23.    Press Council of India(2014) Sub Committee Report on Safety (
24.    Press Council of India (2015) Sub Committee Report on Safety (http://www
25.    Retrieved (2010, March). Atheist guilty over cartoons left at Liverpool airport. merseyside/8549613.stm
26.    Retrieved from
27.    retrieved from article_file/WAN_IFRA_UK_Press_Freedom_Rpt_March_2014.pdf
28.    Retrieved from (
29.    See generally center for media education, alcohol and tobacco on the web: new threats to youth (mar. 1997)
30.    Trager, R. Russomanno, J. Dente Rossand S.; Reynold A. (2014) - Law of Journalism and Communication (2014) Press Freedom in the United Kingdom by World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers March 2014
31.    WashingtonBlog May,2015 Obama Has Sentenced Whistleblowers to 31 Times the Jail Time of All Prior U.S. Presidents Combined obama-has-sentenced-whistleblowers-to-31-times-the-jail-time-of-all-prior-u-s-presidents-combined.html

Recomonded Articles:

International Journal of Reviews and Research in Social Sciences (IJRRSS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, correspondence in....... Read more >>>


Popular Articles

Recent Articles