Author(s): A.K. Sahu

Email(s): Email ID Not Available

DOI: Not Available

Address: Dr. A.K. Sahu
Asst. Professor (Law), School of Studies in Law, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur CG.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 9,      Issue - 4,     Year - 2021


ABSTRACT:
Compulsory retirement is on the ground that his services are no longer required in future. Dismissal etc. are on the ground that the past misconduct has been such as to merit punishment. Punishment is a positive order taking away something whereas compulsory retirement is a negative order refusing to do something in future. The idea that on account of some misconduct, inefficiency, etc. the servant must be punished does not exist when he is compulsorily retired. The idea behind compulsory retirement is that the State will not find his services useful after the date fixed for his retire¬ment and it is not the idea to punish him for something done by him prior to that date. While punishing, the State looks to the past, while compulsorily retiring, it looks to the future, that his services will not be found useful. The ground that the servant has outlived his utility is not finding any fault with him while he is in service. Compulsory retirement under the rule does not amount to punishment. The compulsory retirement is one of the facets of the doctrine of pleasure incorporated in Article 310 of the Constitution and it does not involve any stigma or punishment. The assessment by superior officer shows that he was an average officer and sometimes he was reckless, impolite and suffered from' other infirmities.


Cite this article:
A.K. Sahu. Compulsion Retirement Rule in India. International Journal of Reviews and Research in Social Sciences. 2021; 9(4):164-0.

Cite(Electronic):
A.K. Sahu. Compulsion Retirement Rule in India. International Journal of Reviews and Research in Social Sciences. 2021; 9(4):164-0.   Available on: https://ijrrssonline.in/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-9-4-4


REFERENCES:
1.    Dey, Kaustav; Ray, Pranabesh; Rey, Prabanesh (2003). "VRS and Its Effect on Productivity and Profitability of a Firm". Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. pp. 33–57.
2.    Maheshwari, Sunil Kumar; Kulkarni, Vilas (April 2003). "Implementation of VRS in India". Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers. 28 (2): 75–82.
3.    Abraham, Vinoj; Jain, Ritika (5 June 2015). "Privatisation and the Voluntary Retirement Scheme". Economic and Political Weekly. pp. 7–8.
4.    Guha, B. P. (1996). "Voluntary Retirement Schemes in Indian Industries". Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. pp. 378–391.
5.    Savishinsky, Joel (July 2004). "The Volunteer and the Sannyāsin: Archetypes of Retirement in America and India". The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 59 (1): 25–41.
6.    Dhillon, Preeti; Ladusingh, Laishram (23 October 2013). "Economic activity in post-retirement life in India". Asia-Pacific Population Journal. 26 (3): 55–71.
7.    Kumari Bhat, Anitha; Dhruvarajan, Raj (September 2001). "Ageing in India: drifting intergenerational relations, challenges and options". Ageing and Society. 21 (5): 621–640.
8.    Pandya, Samta P. (2 September 2016). "What do highly qualified professionally achieving women do after retirement in India? Exploring time use, leisure, and volunteering". Journal of Women & Aging. 28 (5): 431–443. 2015.1018050

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): A.K. Sahu

DOI:         Access: Closed Access Read More

International Journal of Reviews and Research in Social Sciences (IJRRSS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, correspondence in....... Read more >>>

RNI:                      
DOI:  

Popular Articles


Recent Articles




Tags